Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
Month Archive

American Heart Association

Mets Sources

Official Mets Web Site
Official Major League Site
Retro Sheet
New York Post Mets Page
New York Daily News Mets Page
Newsday Mets Page
ESPN Mets Page
SNY TV


Other Mets Blogs

Matt Cerone's Mets Blog
Hot Foot
Always Amazin'
Faith and Fear In Flushing
24 Hours From Suicide...A Day In the Life of a Met Fan
Mets Ballers



Search
View Article  Fred Fights Back

In an article in today’s New York Times, Mets owner Fred Wilpon emphatically denies that he will sell the Mets and that the money they lost to Bernie Madoff was nowhere near the reported amount of 700 million dollars. The article has already been linked to on Metsblog.com and talked about on WFAN radio. Yet that has not stopped Evan Roberts, WFAN radio host, and his callers from assuming the article is inaccurate.

 

In the article, the Mets CEO made two points. One: the Mets are not for sale nor will they be in the future. The Mets will remain in the family, meaning Jeff (COO) will inherit the team and so will the grandchildren. Two: the amount of 700 million in losses as some have reported is way off base.

 

The evidence that Roberts, his co-host Joe Benigno, and others use to prove the Mets are hurting financially is that the Mets will reduce payroll next year. If that’s the case, the sole reason has to be that the club was fleeced by the now imprisoned Madoff.

 

But here’s the real story. It is likely that every Major League team with large payrolls will reduce the amount of money they spend next season. Even the powerful and super rich Yankees are said to be reducing their player expenses in 2010. If you haven’t heard, the country is in a recession, the worst since the great depression of the 1930s. Just look at your grocery bill to prove my point.

 

It’s easy for fans to assume the Mets are financially strapped because if the Wilpons have millions, and their revenue streams are tremendous, they should be able to simply spend money on players without consequence. They can’t. And it may have nothing to do with Madoff. It has to do with the economy.

 

A caller to the Saturday morning talk show asked Evan if he was calling Wilpon a liar. Roberts said no, that he liked Fred and thought he was a decent person. Well Evan, what are you calling Fred Wilpon then? You succinctly said that you did not believe his claims in the article because the Mets are cutting payroll next year. Sounds to me like you are saying the Mets owner is lying. But where is the story if Roberts and others were to report that the Yankees, as well as other teams, will br reducing payroll too. As they say, never let the facts get in the way of a good story.

 

Another point to be made here is the bitter Mets fan whose desire is to see the Mets sold. Be careful what you wish for. While many of you think that the Wilpons are only out to make money (as if any one of us is not out to make money), the fact is they spent more money on their payroll than any other team in the National and American League except for the Yankees. That hardly proves that Fred and Jeff are ripping everyone off. If the Mets payroll was 40 million instead of 140 million, I would say there is merit in the claim. But that’s not the case and hasn’t been since the Wilpons took over full ownership several years ago. The Mets will likely continue to field the most expensive team in the NL next season because of how much more they spend compared to other teams and the other teams reducing their payroll as well.

 

If the Mets have spent their money wisely or not is another argument, one worth debating. But if you think Fred and Jeff are skipping gleefully down Flatbush Avenue to the bank this year, you’re wrong. They are just as upset about this season’s result as the most die hard fan. And if you think they are greedy, then it’s all the more reason for them to be upset. Fred knows his team is not the Yankees. He knows if the Mets don’t produce, no one will come. He has been with the organization since 1980. He has seen many empty seats in the lean years and knows that will not pay the bills or put money in his pocket.

 

You want the story of the 2009 Mets? Here it is… The Mets in 2009 suffered unbelievable injuries to all their star players. No team in baseball, including the Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers, and whomever, could have survived by replacing their stars with farmhands standing by. Had the Mets remained healthy, they would have remained competitive, likely battling for the division again. We would probably be arguing over what moves Omar Minaya should have made at the trading deadline to bolster the teams chances in the shadow of falling short the last two seasons but make no mistake, the Mets would be contending.

 

Also, the injuries did expose cracks in the armor. The Tony Bernazard flap would have likely remained dormant had writers not needed something juicy to report. Bernazard needed to go and Minaya’s actions in doing so, blaming writer Adam Ruben, was reprehensible. It may still cost him his position.

 

The farm system was exposed in that the upper levels were barren of talent to bring up or to trade for Major League ready players. But the amount of injuries was so dramatic, I can’t fault Omar for not trading the chips they do have when likely, no difference would have been made.

 

Erin Arvedlund has written a book titled “To Good To Be True” which is about Bernie Madoff and the empire he built by swindling many of the wealthiest Americans. In the book she claims Fred Wilpon will be forced to sell the Mets, maybe as soon as 2010. Maybe she is right and maybe Fred is lying. But many have said the Wilpons assets are stable including Bob Dupay, the president of Major League Baseball. He oversees the financial reports of each team and he has reported the Mets are firmly in the black. Someone is not telling the truth, time will tell who it is.

 

And for those of you praying that Wilpon sells, who do you want to buy the Mets. How about Jim Dolan, he’s done a fine job with the Knicks and Rangers, don’t you think? Leon Hess sold the Jets to many fans’ applause. Just how many Superbowls have the Jets won under Woody Johnson? As I said before, be careful what you wish for. The grass is not always greener.

View Article  In Defense of Citi Field and The Wilpons
I have said all I need to say in defense of Citi Field in previous posts. I'm not going to write it over again except to say that Citi Field is a beautiful ballpark, one of the best in the country. In time we will embrace her because that's where the Mets will play for many years to come.
 
I do not quite understand the attitude of Mets fans. Now I admit to being an older fan (53) and I probably don't relate to the younger set these days. But I find the attitude toward the Mets by many fans to be quite disturbing. There are many Mets fans that have voiced or written logical and reasonable remarks in regards to the Mets and their new ballpark but some of the things I have read I have trouble understanding.
 
There seems to be this underlying hatred toward the Wilpons. I'm not quite sure where this comes from. The perception out there is that the Wilpons are cheap and love the Dodgers more than the Mets. Another perception is that the Wilpons do not cherish Mets history.
 
Yesterday I wrote, somewhat tongue and cheek, that Mets fans have an inferiority complex, especially when it comes to the Yankees. Perhaps I'm closer to the problem than I think. It seems to me that many Mets fans want the Mets to be just like the Yankees. What I don't get is if these fans are so enamored with the Yankees, why don't they just root for them? Why not get rid of all the Mets gear and buy a Yankee cap and jacket and be done with it.
 
I know people that have done that. I remember friends of mine wearing Mets garb in the eighties who traded it all for Yankee gear 10 years later. I have no problem with that, after all it's only a game.
 
But getting back to my perceptions. I do not understand how any Mets fans can think the Wilpons are cheap. Once again this season, the Mets have the highest payroll in the National League, and that's after the Bernie Madoff scandal. Only the Yankees and Red Sox (the Mets payroll maybe higher than the Sox this year, I'm not sure) have a higher payroll. There's those darn Yankees again.
 
Fred Wilpon grew up rooting for the Dodgers of Brooklyn. He pitched batting practice when he was sixteen to his heroes at Ebbets Field. He has fond memories of going to Dodger games with his father. In Citi Field, he wanted to recapture many of his memories for the rest of us to enjoy. How is that somehow disingenuous? I know Fred and Jeff want to make money and last I checked, capitalism was still legal in this country. But the idea that Fred Wilpon is some awful person who wants to denigrate the Mets and somehow bring the Brooklyn Bums back to life (and somehow still make a profit) is simply unfair and ridiculous.
 
From everything I have read, Fred Wilpon is one of the most decent people on the New York scene. I have never heard or read anything bad about Fred. What baseball owner in New York threatened to take his team to New Jersey, Yonkers, or mid town Manhattan if he didn't get his way? Was it Wilpon or was it someone named Steinbrenner? From the moment the New York Post first broke the story in 1997 that the Mets wanted to build a new ballpark, Fred maintained it would be in Queens next to Shea Stadium. Wilpon, the Brooklyn kid who loved the Dodgers, was always committed to keeping the Mets in Queens.
 
What was the cleaner ballpark deal, 800,000 million for Citi Field or an unprecedented 1.5 billion for Yankees Stadium? And what happened to the park land the Yankees were supposed to have returned by now?  
 
The Mets are cheap, really? Since 2005, they signed Carlos Beltran, Pedro Martinez, Billy Wagner, Johan Santana, Frankie Rodriguez, and others to multi million, multi year deals. They have maintained a payroll of roughly 140 million dollars for three years now. As I said above, only the Yankees and perhaps the Red Sox have spent more. Don't forget the Mets would have had the rights to sign Dice-K had the Red Sox not have made such a ridiculous bid for him. The Mets were second in line with their own ridiculous bid beating out the Yankees. Cheap? I think not. Mets fans are simply being lazy and not doing their homework if they think this is what is wrong with the Mets.
 
I agree that the one area where Mets fans have a legitimate gripe is how the Mets treat their history. I was not bothered that Citi Field is not draped in Mets lore. To say it has nothing about the Mets is another lazy talking point. Outside Citi Field, there are drape like banners hanging of many different Mets players of the past. There are large canvasses hung over the left field ramps of many great Mets moments. Inside the stadium are signs for direction with Mr. Met on them. It says "Let's Go Mets" on top of the scoreboard and there are championship banners hanging in right. On the left field wall are the retired numbers. Could there be more? Yes and I am sure there will be. Personally the thought never crossed my mind when I went to Citi Field a couple of weeks ago. I go to a ballgame to see the game. I don't need to be reminded constantly of past glory. But that's just me. Again, I think this feeling comes from jealousy of the Yankees history. I say just let it go.
 
The lightning rod for all this history stuff is the Jackie Robinson Rotunda. Mets fans are not separating the man from history vs. the man from the Dodgers. If Jackie Robinson had debuted for the New York Giants, there still would be a Jackie Robinson Rotunda. The honor is in what he did for civil rights and all minorities, not that he played for the Dodgers. Had the Yankees built the JRR, Mets fans would be screaming that the Mets dropped the ball again.
 
This country owes Robinson for his tremendous courage. Baseball should thank the Mets for this incredible monument for what Robinson accomplished 62 years ago. As a Met fan I am proud they did this. They put an historically significant event that happened on the National League stage in New York ahead of their self interest. 
 
And in regards to Mets history, yesterday, Fred Wilpon said there will be some sort of museum or Mets Hall of Fame in center field in the near future. This was always planned by the way. I recall reading about this in 2006 when plans were first laid for a new ballpark. And you know, had the Mets put up a Hall of Fame, fans would criticize it because it would be dwarfed in comparison to the Yankees. I think some times the Mets cannot win. I do think, and have written about this before, the Mets should re-institute an old timers day. There are plenty of Mets players and opponents Mets fans would love to see in a pre-game ceremony.
 
To some all this up, because frankly I'm tired of writing about it, in time Mets fans will grow to love Citi Field. I really feel what has fostered all the hatred this week is the fact that the Mets have disappointed so greatly the last couple of years. From the moment the Mets lost game seven of the 2006 NLCS to last night's loss to the Padres, Mets fans are frustrated. I share that frustration. I want the Mets to win as much as any Mets fan. But I refuse to pick apart everything the Mets brass has done as a way to channel my anger.
 
The Mets have spent the money on players, made trades to get key players (some bad of course) and funded their own beautiful new ballpark. The fact is it's the players who are not performing. You can argue that the Mets should have signed Manny, a popular complaint this spring. However, I think the Mets have a team that can win. For some reason, these players have gotten off to a slow start, something is not clicking, they lack the killer instinct. That's what has me alarmed and upset, not that there is not enough blue and orange paint in Citi Field.
Metsblog Network Ads
RSS Newsfeeds
Never Forget 69 Main RSS Feed Main Page RSS
Wilpons RSS Feed Wilpons RSS
Search Google