|
|
||||
|
Login
Month Archive
Mets SourcesOfficial Mets Web SiteOfficial Major League Site Retro Sheet New York Post Mets Page New York Daily News Mets Page Newsday Mets Page ESPN Mets Page SNY TV Other Mets BlogsMatt Cerone's Mets BlogHot Foot Always Amazin' Faith and Fear In Flushing 24 Hours From Suicide...A Day In the Life of a Met Fan Mets Ballers Search
|
Thursday, March 26
by
Lou Di Falco
on Thu 26 Mar 2009 03:55 PM EDT
Update -
Yesterday on WFAN's Miked Up, Mets Executive Vice President of Business Operations David Howard was interviewed by Mike Francesa. In the interview, Howard admitted that although season tickets are selling better this year than last, they have not sold as many complete season ticket packages as they had expected. About 200 seats were still available for opening day and were being held for season ticket packages not yet purchased.
In an effort to stimulate sales and to sell out opening day, the Mets decided to create a new package offering left over opening day tickets with four additional games from April and May. The pack is called the Opening Day Pack and gives the buyer the choice of games to pick from during the first two months of the season.
Howard pointed out that the cost of many of the 15 game packages are less than the five pack being offered. His remarks were in response to fans who were angered over having to purchase the 15 games to get opening day tickets only to see a five game pack released at this late date. Another point Howard made was that with the 15 game pack, the games are spread accross the entire season and not just in April and May.
Howard is correct. There are 15 game packs remaining whose ticket prices are lower than the five packs being offered. In fact, some of the 15 packs remaining appear so affordable, I'm considering one myself.
Original Post - March 26
Just when you thought you were shut out of opening day, low and behold you can go to the Mets home opener at Citi Field after all.
Back in the winter you could have obtained opening day tickets by purchasing some sort of season ticket plan. There was the full 81 game plan, two forty game plans, and several different 15 game plans, some that included opening day. Then the Mets held a lottery and selected a number of lucky applicants that received the opportunity to buy tickets to the home opener. When single game tickets went on sale, I checked and the Mets website showed me that indeed the home opener was sold out.
Yesterday, the Mets announced that additional opening day seats are available and they can be had by simply buying an additional four games. The four games must be selected from games in April and May. Just for the heck of it, I went on to the Mets web site to see what is available.
On the ticket page, the Citi Field Opener pack is laid out nicely. You can choose seats in the Metropolitan Box, Field Box (both on the field level) or Caesars Club Bronze (second level). Being not of much funds, I plugged in two seats for the Caesars Club Bronze, the cheaper of the three choices. I also picked games featuring the weaker clubs to drive down the price as much as possible. In other words, I did not select games against the Phillies or Braves as much as I would rather see those teams than the Nationals or the Marlins.
When all was said and done, the cost of my two tickets for five games was $950.00. That's almost a thousand dollars for five games, two hundred dollars per game, one hundred a seat. Selecting the Phillies and Braves for the additional four games raises the price over an additional 200 dollars. I'm not saying the price is not reasonable, it's just not reasonable for me. I would guess not for a lot of other people either. You may think I'm not a die hard fan. I would say that is not true. I, like a lot of other people in this bail out economy, am simply not in the position to pay that kind of money for five games which does not include travel, parking, and concession costs. And if you think I am bashing the Mets, I am not.
The Mets are also feeling the pinch of this economy. They are simply trying to stimulate ticket sales by offering the home opener as an incentive. The point of all this is the Mets are moving into a state of the art, brand spanking new ballpark, having not sold out opening day. That has more to do with the economy than the last two failed Septembers do.
It is very likely that once opening day passes, each game of relative insignificance will be played before a number of empty seats. If you have not noticed, the economy is still bad even though the incentive plans put forth by Obama and the congress are starting to show some positive effects. However, major economists on both sides of the aisle agree that the recovery will be slow and expect it to take a year or perhaps even longer. Given these facts, new park or not, I can't see every Mets game will be a sell out.
And it's not just the Mets. Boston Red Sox tickets are available for certain games. This is historic considering the Red Sox have sold out every game now for a number of years. The Red Sox fans have not grown tired of their team and Boston is still expected to content for another championship. Therefore if Sox tickets can be purchased, you know the economy has something to do with it.
If you happen to think the Mets are out of control with their more expensive tickets ($495 per game), get a load of this.
A friend of mine, a Yankee fan, loves to take his family of five to a game on the Fourth of July. I watched him enter ticket information for the game against Toronto. He made the mistake of selecting best seats available. When the five available tickets came up, we could not believe our eyes. The cost of one game for five came out to be $13,423.50, $2600 per seat plus service charges. That's college tuition for a semester at some colleges. Who in their right mind would pay such an outlandish price for a single baseball game?
Those seats are the most expensive the Yankees have to offer. So the fact they came up suggests no one is buying them. With corporations being looked at with a scrupulous eye, don't expect too many CFOs to approve corporate tickets. Not at those prices.
We may be witnessing the pendulum beginning to swing back the other way. The most expensive seats at the two new ballparks are not selling because the economy is so bad. That means less revenue which will translate into less money being offered to players. At some point, the bubble has to burst. Whether that is happening now or not still remains to be seen but make no mistake, the pin has been pushed into the bubble.
Monday, March 23
by
Lou Di Falco
on Mon 23 Mar 2009 02:04 PM EDT
With Citi Field opening to the public in just six days, there are two new slide shows available from WebShots. The first is from a user know as Citi_Field and the second is from Chris Swan who goes by the moniker of Islandextreme26. I personally want to thank both of these people for doing an outstanding job of documenting the construction of this new world class ballpark. Not to be forgotten is Eric Okurowski whose site, Stadiumpage.com, has chronicled the construction as well. It's hard to believe that the Mets are about to move into one of the most advanced baseball stadiums ever built. The early reviews have been good by people who have taken ticket tours. It seems like just yesterday that Fred Wilpon and company held a press conference in the Diamond Club of Shea Stadium announcing the plans to build the new park. On Sunday, March 26, Citi Field's doors will open for the first time. Not the Mets but a college game will be played in an attempt to work out any last minute kinks before the Mets play the Red Sox in two exhibition games the following weekend. So very likely the next set of pictures we see of the new digs will include people (lots of them) sitting in the seats. Even after the park opens, there will be work to be done. There still is quite a bit of rubble from the Shea site that must be removed. It is likely the parking lot where Shea once stood will not be completed till sometime in May. Enjoy these new photos...
Citi Field 3-21-09 Saturday, March 21
by
Lou Di Falco
on Sat 21 Mar 2009 11:31 PM EDT
Stadiumpage.com has posted brand new interior shots from Citi Field. The photos were taken by Chris Swann. In them, you will see the skyline from the old scoreboard at Shea Stadium has found a new home. Plus, the Apple has grown a stem, the grass looks recently groomed, more signage is up, and the Jackie Robinson Rotunda is nearly complete. Oh, and who is Ben?
Sunday, March 8
by
Lou Di Falco
on Sun 08 Mar 2009 10:15 PM EDT
On Friday, Yankee announcer and talk show host Michael Kay was given a personal tour of Citi Field by COO Jeff Wilpon. On his afternoon radio show, Michael was raving about the ballpark, saying that Mets fans will never feel like second citizens again when it comes to their home. His only criticisms were of the chop shops next door and seating capacity at only 42,500. I agree about the amount of seats but the Iron Triangle will be rebuilt over the next ten years. The latest from the camera of Citi_Field from Webshots... Citi Field Construction 3/7/09 Friday, March 6
by
Lou Di Falco
on Fri 06 Mar 2009 12:51 PM EST
Citigroup Inc. (c) stock went under one dollar yesterday and is now hovering just above at 1.02. A stock that had a 52 week high of 27.35 is now hanging by a thread. How much longer do you think Citi Field will be called Citi Field?
There are two sides to this argument and both are good ones. Citigroup Inc. is one of many corporations that have accepted TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) money. The cry from many has been how does a company using U.S. Taxpayer money to bail themselves out of financial catastrophe have the nerve to give the Mets 20 million per year over 20 years? How can they lay off employees but yet give the Mets all this money, money they have received from the government?
The other side of the argument is that Citigroup is not the only company receiving TARP that has naming rights deals with professional sports teams. In fact, there are 44 other companies in similar deals as the Mets have but not as lucrative. Also, a corporation should be able to spend money on advertising otherwise they will surely go out of business. The association with the Mets gives Citi a huge profile that could eventually help turn things around.
But regardless of what argument you want to side with, the fact is Citigroup is suffering and things are not turning around fast. Through it all however, the Mets and Citi have remained adamant about keeping their deal in place.
You cannot fault the Mets here. Some have criticized them for not breaking the deal with Citi. Why should they? What have the Mets done wrong here? They negotiated a good deal for themselves. It would make no sense for them to break it off. Plus both parties have signed a legally binding contract. It's not as if a simple phone call would terminate the relationship. Ending the deal would likely involve many lawyers and a court case or two.
Never the less, Citigroup Inc. may not be in any reasonable financial condition much longer and they could be acquired by another entity. If that were to happen, it is likely the deal would be restructured as part of the process of acquisition. Such a deal could give the Mets an out to seek a relationship with another corporation. But it is unlikely the Mets would find anyone willing to fork over the kind of cash they negotiated from Citi. To date, the Citi-Mets deal is the largest ever.
The Mets new ballpark will likely be called Citi Field at least for this season. But a year from now, don't be surprised if you will be returning to see the Mets at Morgan Stanley Field or Wells Fargo Park. Perhaps we might even be going back to Shea Stadium. Now wouldn't that be something.
Sunday, March 1
by
Lou Di Falco
on Sun 01 Mar 2009 10:05 AM EST
There are two new slide shows of the interior of Citi Field from WebShots users islandextreme26 and citi_field. Citi_field, who was there on tour on Friday, sent me an email indicating that the view from behind the ribbon board is nowhere as bad as many of the stories wandering around the Internet. Admittedly, I have been writing about this problem as well based on previous photos I have seen. The pics from citi_field point out that just leaning an inch or two forward allows the front row fan to see the entire infield without obstruction. So if anything, the problem is not as big and will be easier to solve for children who might be sitting in the first row in the three sections on the first and third base side. There are some wonderful shots here...
|
Metsblog Network Ads
Recent Comments
Search Google
|
||
