
You've Got to Be Kidding Me
by
Lou Di Falco
on Mon 24 Aug 2009 08:00 AM EDT
In this most forgettable season, another event occurred to drive home the point that their must be a curse on the Mets in 2009. Yesterday’s game ends on an unassisted triple play, the first time it ever happened in the National League. It could only happen to the Mets. It could only happen this year when Murphy's Law (not Bob Murphy, the other Murphy) is proven day in and day out at Citi Field and any other NL ballpark where the Mets happen to be playing.
What else can go wrong or happen to this club. I shudder to think of it. Maybe the Mets would be best to forfeit the rest of their games and go home. Go home and hide. Stay indoors. Don't come out till next spring.
What harm would it have done for the baseball gods to allow the Mets to come back and win this one game for their fans? It wouldn't have made any difference. The Mets aren't going anywhere anyway.
There they were, having fought back all day scoring seven runs to come within two. They had overcome the deficit that Oliver (how do the Mets get rid of this guy) Perez created when he allowed two three run bombs then was pulled after going 3-0 against Pedro Martinez all in the first inning. Then in the bottom of the ninth, the Mets get two on with no out with Jeff Francoeur up. Frenchy hits the ball up the middle but the Mets runners are attempting to steal. Instead of the line drive going through to the outfield, the ball is caught by Phillies second baseman Eric Bruntlett who immediately steps on the bag then tags Daniel Murphy who was charging from first. Unbelievable. Not really though. Not the way this year has gone.
In a season where the wheels have completely fallen off, it's not that shocking really that the game ended like this. It is so amazing though when you think it can't get any worse, it does.
The Mets are now ten games under .500. A while back when it was obvious the Mets would not be going to the post season, I stated my simple goal for the Mets would be to finish at or above .500. Forget it. That won’t happen either. For the Mets to end exactly at .500, they would need to go 24-14, 10 games over .500. Do you feel confident that could happen with Oliver Perez, Bobby Parnell, Tim Redding, and Mike Pelfrey in the starting rotation? Do you think it could happen when your fifth hitter is Corey Sullivan?
The last time the Mets were ten games under .500 was on August 30, 2004, almost five years ago. That year, the Mets went on to a 71-91 record. Only the Montreal Expos were worse in the division.
And for those of you who say remember 1973 I say give me a break. Yes it’s true. The Mets were ten games below .500 on August 24, 1973, 36 years ago. But here’s the difference. The division leading Cardinals were only three games above .500 and were not running away with the division. Also the Mets starting staff was comprised of Tom Seaver, Jon Matlack, Jerry Koosman, and George Stone. With all due respect to Johan Santana, this year’s staff does not deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as the ’73 team.
If the first batter in Citi Field history hitting a lead off home run off of Mike Pelfrey to yesterday’s unassisted triple play to end the game doesn’t convince you this season is over, I’m not sure what will.
But look at the bright side. In yesterday's New York Post, Fred Wilpon was quoted as saying Omar Minaya will be back as GM next year. That's got to make you feel better, no?